Report

Does Competition Enhance Performance or Cheating? A Laboratory Experiment

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Schwieren, Christiane
Weichselbaumer, Doris

Abstract / Description

In this paper we experimentally test whether competing for a desired reward does not only affect individuals' performance, but also their tendency to cheat. Recent doping scandals in sports as well as forgery and plagiarism scandals in academia have been partially explained by competitive pressures', which suggests a link between competition and cheating. In our experiment subjects conduct a task where they have the possibility to make use of illegitimate tools to better their results. We find that women react much stronger to competitive pressure by increasing their cheating activity while there is no overall sex difference in cheating. However, the effect of competition on women's cheating behavior is entirely due to the fact that women, on average, are doing worse with respect to the assigned task. Indeed we find that it is the ability of an individual to conduct a particular task and not sex that crucially affects the reaction to competition. Poor performers significantly increase their cheating behavior under competition which may be a face-saving strategy or an attempt to retain a chance of winning.

Keyword(s)

Wettkampf Betrug Experiment Stückzahl Anzahl competition tournament piece rate cheating experiment

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2008

Is part of series

Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/ Institute for the Study of Labor: IZA Discussion Paper Series;3275

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schwieren, Christiane
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Weichselbaumer, Doris
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-17T11:04:55Z
  • Made available on
    2008-06-02
  • Made available on
    2015-12-01T10:32:08Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-17T11:04:55Z
  • Date of first publication
    2008
  • Abstract / Description
    In this paper we experimentally test whether competing for a desired reward does not only affect individuals' performance, but also their tendency to cheat. Recent doping scandals in sports as well as forgery and plagiarism scandals in academia have been partially explained by competitive pressures', which suggests a link between competition and cheating. In our experiment subjects conduct a task where they have the possibility to make use of illegitimate tools to better their results. We find that women react much stronger to competitive pressure by increasing their cheating activity while there is no overall sex difference in cheating. However, the effect of competition on women's cheating behavior is entirely due to the fact that women, on average, are doing worse with respect to the assigned task. Indeed we find that it is the ability of an individual to conduct a particular task and not sex that crucially affects the reaction to competition. Poor performers significantly increase their cheating behavior under competition which may be a face-saving strategy or an attempt to retain a chance of winning.
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-16143
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/1080
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.9055
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Is part of
    IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 3275
  • Is part of series
    Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/ Institute for the Study of Labor: IZA Discussion Paper Series;3275
  • Keyword(s)
    Wettkampf
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Betrug
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Experiment
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Stückzahl
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Anzahl
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    competition
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    tournament
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    piece rate
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    cheating
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    experiment
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Does Competition Enhance Performance or Cheating? A Laboratory Experiment
    en
  • DRO type
    report
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsyDok