Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects?
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Müsseler, Jochen
Kunde, Wilfried
Gausepohl, Detlef
Heuer, Herbert
Abstract / Description
Responding to a stimulus is faster and more accurate when stimulus location and response location spatially correspond than when they do not correspond (stimulus-response compatibility). In five experiments this standard compatibility effect is examined when using a T-shaped lever as a tool. Handling the lever allowed distinguishing body-related action effects (e.g., the tactile feedback from the moving finger) from external action effects (e.g., reaching at the stimulus with the levers end-point). Results showed that the spatial relationship between stimulus and the direction of the hand movement (S-R compatibility) as well as the relationship between the stimulus and the functional end-points of the tool (S-E compatibility) determine performance. More precisely, responses were fast and less error prone when both kinds of compatibility did correspond than when they did not correspond.
Keyword(s)
Raumwahrnehmung Kompatibilität Reizantwort Werkzeuggebrauch Bewegungskoordination Feinmotorik Räumliche Kompatibilitätseffekte Stimulus-Response-Kompatibilität Werkzeuggebrauch Motorische Koordination Lernen feinmotorischer Fertigkeiten spatial compatibility effects stimulus-response compatibility tool Tool Use Motor Coordination Fine Motor Skill LearningPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2008
Citation
-
2008MuEtAlECP.pdfAdobe PDF - 1.1MBMD5: a5c50c415190bae1f516f498777bce07
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Müsseler, Jochen
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kunde, Wilfried
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Gausepohl, Detlef
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Heuer, Herbert
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-11-17T11:05:56Z
-
Made available on2010-05-28
-
Made available on2015-12-01T10:30:49Z
-
Made available on2022-11-17T11:05:56Z
-
Date of first publication2008
-
Abstract / DescriptionResponding to a stimulus is faster and more accurate when stimulus location and response location spatially correspond than when they do not correspond (stimulus-response compatibility). In five experiments this standard compatibility effect is examined when using a T-shaped lever as a tool. Handling the lever allowed distinguishing body-related action effects (e.g., the tactile feedback from the moving finger) from external action effects (e.g., reaching at the stimulus with the levers end-point). Results showed that the spatial relationship between stimulus and the direction of the hand movement (S-R compatibility) as well as the relationship between the stimulus and the functional end-points of the tool (S-E compatibility) determine performance. More precisely, responses were fast and less error prone when both kinds of compatibility did correspond than when they did not correspond.en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-26163
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/639
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.9091
-
Language of contenteng
-
Is part ofhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a779058400&db=all
-
Keyword(s)Raumwahrnehmungde
-
Keyword(s)Kompatibilitätde
-
Keyword(s)Reizantwortde
-
Keyword(s)Werkzeuggebrauchde
-
Keyword(s)Bewegungskoordinationde
-
Keyword(s)Feinmotorikde
-
Keyword(s)Räumliche Kompatibilitätseffektede
-
Keyword(s)Stimulus-Response-Kompatibilitätde
-
Keyword(s)Werkzeuggebrauchde
-
Keyword(s)Motorische Koordinationde
-
Keyword(s)Lernen feinmotorischer Fertigkeitende
-
Keyword(s)spatial compatibility effectsen
-
Keyword(s)stimulus-response compatibilityen
-
Keyword(s)toolen
-
Keyword(s)Tool Useen
-
Keyword(s)Motor Coordinationen
-
Keyword(s)Fine Motor Skill Learningen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleDoes a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects?en
-
DRO typereport
-
Visible tag(s)PsyDok