Further evidence on the invalidity of self-reported consistency
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Schmitt,Manfred
Abstract / Description
Every day life frequently requires informal reasoning about probabilistic events even though formal education in probabilistic reasoning is considered a difficult advanced topic. The large number of probabilistic expressions in common usage (such as rarely, probably, seldom, possibly) are evidence of the importance of informal probabilistic reasoning. To communicate and reason effectively about probabilistic events, these expressions should have mutually understood, reasonably precise interpretations. Informal interviews suggest, however, that these expressions are generally vague and imprecise.
Keyword(s)
KonsistenzPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
1990
Is part of
In: Drenth, Pieter u.a. (Hgg.): European perspectives in Psychology. Bd. 1. Chichester u.a. 1990. S. 57-68.
Citation
-
Further_evidence_on_the_invalidity_of_self_reported_consistency.pdfAdobe PDF - 1.52MBMD5: 7b3563a52c08f55f9f1dc8f9bcfcd133
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Schmitt,Manfred
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-11-21T13:56:18Z
-
Made available on2014-08-11
-
Made available on2015-12-01T10:31:17Z
-
Made available on2022-11-21T13:56:18Z
-
Date of first publication1990
-
Abstract / DescriptionEvery day life frequently requires informal reasoning about probabilistic events even though formal education in probabilistic reasoning is considered a difficult advanced topic. The large number of probabilistic expressions in common usage (such as rarely, probably, seldom, possibly) are evidence of the importance of informal probabilistic reasoning. To communicate and reason effectively about probabilistic events, these expressions should have mutually understood, reasonably precise interpretations. Informal interviews suggest, however, that these expressions are generally vague and imprecise.en
-
Publication statusunknown
-
Review statusunknown
-
ISBN978-0-471-92507-1
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-51168
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/865
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.10199
-
Language of contenteng
-
Is part ofIn: Drenth, Pieter u.a. (Hgg.): European perspectives in Psychology. Bd. 1. Chichester u.a. 1990. S. 57-68.
-
Keyword(s)Konsistenzde
-
Keyword(s)Selbstkontrollede
-
Keyword(s)Statistikde
-
Keyword(s)Validitätde
-
Keyword(s)Persönlichkeitsfaktorde
-
Keyword(s)Probabilistische Testtheoriede
-
Keyword(s)Consistency (Measurement)en
-
Keyword(s)Self Reporten
-
Keyword(s)Statistical Validityen
-
Keyword(s)Item Response Theoryen
-
Keyword(s)Personality Traitsen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleFurther evidence on the invalidity of self-reported consistencyde
-
DRO typebookPart
-
Visible tag(s)PsyDok