Report

Born To Be Mild? Cohort Effects Don't (Fully) Explain Why Well-Being Is U-Shaped in Age

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Clark, Andrew E.

Abstract / Description

The statistical analysis of cross-section data very often reveals a U-shaped relationship between subjective well-being and age. This paper uses fourteen waves of British panel data to distinguish between two potential explanations of this shape: a pure life-cycle or aging effect, and a fixed cohort effect depending on year of birth. Panel analysis controlling for fixed effects continues to produce a U-shaped relationship between well-being and age, although this U-shape is flatter for life satisfaction than for the GHQ measure of mental well-being. The pattern of the estimated cohort effects also differs between the two well-being measures and, to an extent, by demographic group. In particular, those born earlier report more positive GHQ scores, controlling for their current age; this phenomenon is especially prevalent for women.

Keyword(s)

Psychologie Subjektives Befinden Psychologie Subjektives Befinden subjective well-being cohorts fixed effects panel data

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2007

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Clark, Andrew E.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-17T11:03:28Z
  • Made available on
    2008-01-14
  • Made available on
    2015-12-01T10:32:06Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-17T11:03:28Z
  • Date of first publication
    2007
  • Abstract / Description
    The statistical analysis of cross-section data very often reveals a U-shaped relationship between subjective well-being and age. This paper uses fourteen waves of British panel data to distinguish between two potential explanations of this shape: a pure life-cycle or aging effect, and a fixed cohort effect depending on year of birth. Panel analysis controlling for fixed effects continues to produce a U-shaped relationship between well-being and age, although this U-shape is flatter for life satisfaction than for the GHQ measure of mental well-being. The pattern of the estimated cohort effects also differs between the two well-being measures and, to an extent, by demographic group. In particular, those born earlier report more positive GHQ scores, controlling for their current age; this phenomenon is especially prevalent for women.
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-10979
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/1053
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.8996
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Is part of
    Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA Discussion Paper No. 3170
  • Keyword(s)
    Psychologie
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Subjektives Befinden
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Psychologie
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Subjektives Befinden
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    subjective well-being
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    cohorts
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    fixed effects
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    panel data
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Born To Be Mild? Cohort Effects Don't (Fully) Explain Why Well-Being Is U-Shaped in Age
    de
  • DRO type
    report
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsyDok