What Happiness Research Can Tell Us About Self-Control Problems and Utility Misprediction
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Stutzer, Alois
Frey, Bruno S.
Abstract / Description
Neoclassical economic theory rules out systematic errors in consumption choice. According to the basic view, individuals know what they choose. They are able to predict how much utility an activity or a good produces for them now and in the future and they can maximize their utility. This implies that behavior reveals consistent preferences. This approach makes it impossible to detect and understand sub-optimal consumption decisions, due to problems of self-control and the misprediction of utility. We propose the economics of happiness as a methodological approach to study these phenomena. Based on proxy measures for experienced utility, it is, in principle, possible to directly address whether some observed behavior is sub-optimal and is therefore reducing a person's well-being. We discuss recent evidence on smoking and eating habits, TV viewing and commuting choice.
Keyword(s)
Anpassung Entscheidung Selbstkontrolle Zufriedenheit Nutzen Anpassung Entscheidung Selbstkontrolle Zufriedenheit Nutzen adaptation individual decision-making revealed preference self-control subjective well-being utility mispredictionPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2006
Is part of series
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/ Institute for the Study of Labor: IZA Discussion Paper Series;1952
Citation
-
dp1952.pdfAdobe PDF - 286.01KBMD5: 861ec426ade092ae585f3cce70380bb9
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Stutzer, Alois
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Frey, Bruno S.
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-11-17T11:05:09Z
-
Made available on2008-06-09
-
Made available on2015-12-01T10:32:13Z
-
Made available on2022-11-17T11:05:09Z
-
Date of first publication2006
-
Abstract / DescriptionNeoclassical economic theory rules out systematic errors in consumption choice. According to the basic view, individuals know what they choose. They are able to predict how much utility an activity or a good produces for them now and in the future and they can maximize their utility. This implies that behavior reveals consistent preferences. This approach makes it impossible to detect and understand sub-optimal consumption decisions, due to problems of self-control and the misprediction of utility. We propose the economics of happiness as a methodological approach to study these phenomena. Based on proxy measures for experienced utility, it is, in principle, possible to directly address whether some observed behavior is sub-optimal and is therefore reducing a person's well-being. We discuss recent evidence on smoking and eating habits, TV viewing and commuting choice.en
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-16573
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/1116
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.9064
-
Language of contenteng
-
Is part ofIZA Discussion Paper Series No. 1952
-
Is part of seriesForschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/ Institute for the Study of Labor: IZA Discussion Paper Series;1952
-
Keyword(s)Anpassungde
-
Keyword(s)Entscheidungde
-
Keyword(s)Selbstkontrollede
-
Keyword(s)Zufriedenheitde
-
Keyword(s)Nutzende
-
Keyword(s)Anpassungde
-
Keyword(s)Entscheidungde
-
Keyword(s)Selbstkontrollede
-
Keyword(s)Zufriedenheitde
-
Keyword(s)Nutzende
-
Keyword(s)adaptationen
-
Keyword(s)individual decision-makingen
-
Keyword(s)revealed preferenceen
-
Keyword(s)self-controlen
-
Keyword(s)subjective well-beingen
-
Keyword(s)utility mispredictionen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleWhat Happiness Research Can Tell Us About Self-Control Problems and Utility Mispredictionen
-
DRO typereport
-
Visible tag(s)PsyDok