Report

The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Singer, Tania
Fehr, Ernst

Abstract / Description

The most fundamental solution concepts in Game Theory — Nash equilibrium, backward induction, and iterated elimination of dominated strategies - are based on the assumption that people are capable of predicting others' actions. These concepts require people to be able to view the game from the other players' perspectives, i.e. to understand others' motives and beliefs. Economists still know little about what enables people to put themselves into others' shoes and how this ability interacts with their own preferences and beliefs. Social neuroscience provides insights into the neural mechanism underlying our capacity to represent others' intentions, beliefs, and desires, referred to as 'Theory of Mind' or 'mentalizing', and the capacity to share the feelings of others, referred to as 'empathy'. We summarize the major findings about the neural basis of mentalizing and empathizing and discuss some implications for economics.

Keyword(s)

Einfühlung Neurowissenschaft Gedächtnislesen neuroeconomics mind reading empathy

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2005

Is part of series

Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/ Institute for the Study of Labor: IZA Discussion Paper Series;1647

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Singer, Tania
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Fehr, Ernst
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-17T11:02:22Z
  • Made available on
    2008-06-30
  • Made available on
    2015-12-01T10:32:16Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-17T11:02:22Z
  • Date of first publication
    2005
  • Abstract / Description
    The most fundamental solution concepts in Game Theory — Nash equilibrium, backward induction, and iterated elimination of dominated strategies - are based on the assumption that people are capable of predicting others' actions. These concepts require people to be able to view the game from the other players' perspectives, i.e. to understand others' motives and beliefs. Economists still know little about what enables people to put themselves into others' shoes and how this ability interacts with their own preferences and beliefs. Social neuroscience provides insights into the neural mechanism underlying our capacity to represent others' intentions, beliefs, and desires, referred to as 'Theory of Mind' or 'mentalizing', and the capacity to share the feelings of others, referred to as 'empathy'. We summarize the major findings about the neural basis of mentalizing and empathizing and discuss some implications for economics.
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-16664
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/1148
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.8937
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Is part of
    IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 1647
  • Is part of series
    Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/ Institute for the Study of Labor: IZA Discussion Paper Series;1647
  • Keyword(s)
    Einfühlung
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Neurowissenschaft
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Gedächtnislesen
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    neuroeconomics
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    mind reading
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    empathy
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy
    en
  • DRO type
    report
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsyDok