Report

Two spatial maps for perceived visual space: Evidence from relative mislocalizations

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Müsseler, Jochen
van der Heijden, A.H.C.

Abstract / Description

When observers are asked to localize the peripheral position of a target with respect to the midposition of a spatially extended comparison stimulus, they tend to mislocalize the target as being more outer than the midposition of the comparison stimulus (cf. Muumlsseler, Van der Heijden, Mahmud, Deubel, & Ertsey, 1999). For explaining this finding, we examined a model that postulates that in the calculation of perceived positions two sources are involved, a sensory map and a motor map. The sensory map provides vision and the motor map contains information for saccadic eye movements. The model predicts that errors in location judgements will be observed when the motor map has to provide the information for the judgements. In four experiments we examined, and found evidence for, this prediction. Localization errors were found in all conditions in which the motor map had to be used but not in conditions in which the sensory map could be used.

Keyword(s)

Lokalisation Fehlleistung Raumwahrnehmung Fehler Information Kognitiver Prozess Kanalkapazität Räumliche Wahrnehmung Fehler Visuell-räumliche Fähigkeit Information Visuelle Suchprozesse Kanalkapazität spatial maps visual space mislocalizations Localization

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2004

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Müsseler, Jochen
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    van der Heijden, A.H.C.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-17T11:01:47Z
  • Made available on
    2010-05-28
  • Made available on
    2015-12-01T10:32:29Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-17T11:01:47Z
  • Date of first publication
    2004
  • Abstract / Description
    When observers are asked to localize the peripheral position of a target with respect to the midposition of a spatially extended comparison stimulus, they tend to mislocalize the target as being more outer than the midposition of the comparison stimulus (cf. Muumlsseler, Van der Heijden, Mahmud, Deubel, & Ertsey, 1999). For explaining this finding, we examined a model that postulates that in the calculation of perceived positions two sources are involved, a sensory map and a motor map. The sensory map provides vision and the motor map contains information for saccadic eye movements. The model predicts that errors in location judgements will be observed when the motor map has to provide the information for the judgements. In four experiments we examined, and found evidence for, this prediction. Localization errors were found in all conditions in which the motor map had to be used but not in conditions in which the sensory map could be used.
    en
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-26133
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/1305
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.8901
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Is part of
    http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a714022279&db=all
  • Keyword(s)
    Lokalisation
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Fehlleistung
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Raumwahrnehmung
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Fehler
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Information
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Kognitiver Prozess
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Kanalkapazität
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Räumliche Wahrnehmung
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Fehler
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Visuell-räumliche Fähigkeit
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Information
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Visuelle Suchprozesse
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Kanalkapazität
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    spatial maps
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    visual space
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    mislocalizations
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Localization
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Two spatial maps for perceived visual space: Evidence from relative mislocalizations
    en
  • DRO type
    report
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsyDok