Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/387
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorReisenzein, Rainer
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-30
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T10:30:25Z-
dc.date.available2007-01-30
dc.date.available2015-12-01T10:30:25Z-
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.otherurn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-8911-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/387-
dc.description.abstractThe semantic theory of emotion words recently proposed by Johnson-Laird and Oatley (1989)was empirically investigated in three studies. In all three studies, I assessed, for different samples of German nonbasic emotion words: (a)subjects' judgements of the conditional probability of experiencing basic emotions, given the experience of nonbasic ones; and (b) their beliefs about whether it is possible to experience nonbasic emotions without also experiencing basic emotions. In Study 1, I examined the proposed semantic relations between 48 nonbasic and their defining basic emotion words, as well as 14 of the proposed semantic relations among nonbasic emotion words. In Study 2, these tests were repeated using object-focused test sentences. In Study 3, the semantically based relations among 12 emotions were compared to all of the nonsemantic relations existing among these emotions, and the theory was additionally tested by examining self-ascriptions of emotion words in concrete situations (hypothetical scenarios). I found that (1) the semantic theory of emotion words proposed by Johnson-Laird and Oatley (1989) was consistently unsupported for the disgust-derivatives, and that in a substantial number of cases a second nonbasic emotion was nearly as prominent as the modal one (Study 1); (2) the conditional probability and possibility relations between allegedly semantically connected emotion pairs were frequently no stronger or even weaker than those between semantically unconnected ones (Studies 1, 3); (3) in terms of absolute judgements, the data fell considerably short of the theoretically predicted results (all studies), paricularly when (4) object-focused emotion words were used (Study 2); and (5) no more favourable results were obtained when subjects' self-ascriptions of emotion words in concrete situations were examined (Study 3). These findings call in question Johnson-Lairds and Oatley's semantic theory of emotion words and potentially also their theory of emotions.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightspubl-ohne-podde
dc.rights.urihttp://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.phpde
dc.subject.classificationGefühlde
dc.subject.classificationStudiede
dc.subject.classificationTheoriede
ubs.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.otherOatleyde
dc.subject.otherJohnson-Lairdde
dc.subject.otheraffective lexiconen
dc.subject.otherstudyen
dc.subject.othersemantic theoryen
dc.subject.otherOatleyen
dc.subject.otherJohnson-Lairden
dc.titleOn Oatley and Johnson-Laird's theory of emotion and hierarchical structures in the affective lexiconen
dc.typeAufsatz
dc.date.updated2012-10-18
ubs.publikation.typarticle
ubs.publikation.sourceCognition and Emotion
ubs.bemerkung.externPDF nicht mehr vorhanden. Zu finden unter <a href="http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1080/02699939508408973">DOI:10.1080/02699939508408973</a>.
ubs.institutFreie Universität Berlin: Fachbereich Erziehungswissenshaft und Psychologie
ubs.fakultaetPsychologie: Hochschulen Deutschland
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:PsyDok

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.