Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Steinhauser, Marco
Maier, Martin
Hübner, Ronald
Abstract / Description
The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying error detection in the error signaling response. The authors tested between a response monitoring account and a conflict monitoring account. By implementing each account within the neural network model of N. Yeung, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen (2004), they demonstrated that both accounts make different predictions as to how error signaling performance is influenced by varying the participants' response criterion. These predictions were tested in an experiment using the Eriksen-flanker task. The qualitative pattern as well as a model fit favored the response monitoring account, which states that error detection is mediated by detecting internal error corrections.
Keyword(s)
Fehleranalyse reaktionsoptimierung Psychischer Konflikt Fehler Fehleranalyse Überwachen Reaktionsparameter Konflikt Visuelle Diskrimination error detection error correction response conflict connectionist modeling Eriksen-flanker taskPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2008
Publication status
unknown
Review status
unknown
Is version of
Citation
-
Steinhauser_al_08_JEPHPP.pdfAdobe PDF - 866.96KBMD5: 959ab533865927f22a1f8d6fe9800a11
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Steinhauser, Marco
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Maier, Martin
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Hübner, Ronald
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-11-22T06:49:45Z
-
Made available on2008-07-11
-
Made available on2015-12-01T10:30:34Z
-
Made available on2022-11-22T06:49:45Z
-
Date of first publication2008
-
Abstract / DescriptionThe present study investigated the mechanisms underlying error detection in the error signaling response. The authors tested between a response monitoring account and a conflict monitoring account. By implementing each account within the neural network model of N. Yeung, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen (2004), they demonstrated that both accounts make different predictions as to how error signaling performance is influenced by varying the participants' response criterion. These predictions were tested in an experiment using the Eriksen-flanker task. The qualitative pattern as well as a model fit favored the response monitoring account, which states that error detection is mediated by detecting internal error corrections.en
-
Publication statusunknown
-
Review statusunknown
-
ISSN0096-1523
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-58714
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/473
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.11285
-
Language of contenteng
-
Is part ofFirst publ. in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34 (2008), 1, pp. 158-176
-
Is version ofhttp://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2008/5871/
-
Keyword(s)Fehleranalysede
-
Keyword(s)reaktionsoptimierungde
-
Keyword(s)Psychischer Konfliktde
-
Keyword(s)Fehlerde
-
Keyword(s)Fehleranalysede
-
Keyword(s)Überwachende
-
Keyword(s)Reaktionsparameterde
-
Keyword(s)Konfliktde
-
Keyword(s)Visuelle Diskriminationde
-
Keyword(s)error detectionen
-
Keyword(s)error correctionen
-
Keyword(s)response conflicten
-
Keyword(s)connectionist modelingen
-
Keyword(s)Eriksen-flanker tasken
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleModeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoringen
-
DRO typearticle
-
Visible tag(s)PsyDok