Article

Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Steinhauser, Marco
Maier, Martin
Hübner, Ronald

Abstract / Description

The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying error detection in the error signaling response. The authors tested between a response monitoring account and a conflict monitoring account. By implementing each account within the neural network model of N. Yeung, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen (2004), they demonstrated that both accounts make different predictions as to how error signaling performance is influenced by varying the participants' response criterion. These predictions were tested in an experiment using the Eriksen-flanker task. The qualitative pattern as well as a model fit favored the response monitoring account, which states that error detection is mediated by detecting internal error corrections.

Keyword(s)

Fehleranalyse reaktionsoptimierung Psychischer Konflikt Fehler Fehleranalyse Überwachen Reaktionsparameter Konflikt Visuelle Diskrimination error detection error correction response conflict connectionist modeling Eriksen-flanker task

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2008

Publication status

unknown

Review status

unknown

Is version of

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Steinhauser, Marco
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Maier, Martin
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hübner, Ronald
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-22T06:49:45Z
  • Made available on
    2008-07-11
  • Made available on
    2015-12-01T10:30:34Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-22T06:49:45Z
  • Date of first publication
    2008
  • Abstract / Description
    The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying error detection in the error signaling response. The authors tested between a response monitoring account and a conflict monitoring account. By implementing each account within the neural network model of N. Yeung, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen (2004), they demonstrated that both accounts make different predictions as to how error signaling performance is influenced by varying the participants' response criterion. These predictions were tested in an experiment using the Eriksen-flanker task. The qualitative pattern as well as a model fit favored the response monitoring account, which states that error detection is mediated by detecting internal error corrections.
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • ISSN
    0096-1523
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-58714
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/473
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.11285
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Is part of
    First publ. in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34 (2008), 1, pp. 158-176
  • Is version of
    http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2008/5871/
  • Keyword(s)
    Fehleranalyse
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    reaktionsoptimierung
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Psychischer Konflikt
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Fehler
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Fehleranalyse
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Überwachen
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Reaktionsparameter
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Konflikt
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Visuelle Diskrimination
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    error detection
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    error correction
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    response conflict
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    connectionist modeling
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Eriksen-flanker task
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring
    en
  • DRO type
    article
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsyDok