Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/575
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorWitte, E.H.
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-23
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T10:30:43Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-23
dc.date.available2015-12-01T10:30:43Z-
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.otherurn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-23063-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/575-
dc.description.abstractIt really comes as a surprise to read a discussion about the group polarization effect, a field that goes back so many years (Rodrigo & Ato, 2002, 2002a; Kiers, 2002). Usually the publication rate follows an epidemic spread curve (Nowakowska, 1973), which means we should by now be immune from this bacillus called the "group polarization effect'. The recent discussion, however, is a good example of the tendencies in our world of research: After more than 40 years of research in this area, two young colleagues are able to correctly point out the "lack of fit between the definition and the statistical analysis of the group polarization phenomenon' (2002, p. 5). As someone who started his own research in this area more than 30 years ago (Witte, 1971, 1971a) I feel obliged to join the discussion from a more fundamental and historical angle. Traditionally our approach is to detect effects and then list them in our textbooks, e.g., the Ringelmann-effect, the autokinetic effect, the Asch conformity effect, Milgram's obedience effect, Latane's bystander effect, shared view effect, Koehler effect, blocking effect, group polarization effect, and many more. We are now in a situation where one of these effects is being questioned due to a fundamental error in the evaluation methods that were employed. Perhaps this deficit is much more general than we assume, and may apply to many more effects we are familiar with.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHamburger Forschungsberichte zur Sozialpsychologie;39
dc.rightspubl-ohne-podde
dc.rights.urihttp://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.phpde
dc.subject.classificationGruppede
dc.subject.classificationPolarisierungde
dc.subject.classificationInterpersonale Kommunikationde
ubs.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.otherGruppede
dc.subject.otherPolarisierungde
dc.subject.otherInterpersonale Kommunikationde
dc.subject.othergroup polarization effecten
dc.subject.otherdiscussionen
dc.titleThe group polarization effect: To be or not to be?en
dc.typeReport (Bericht)
dc.date.updated2014-02-27
ubs.publikation.typreport
ubs.institutUniversität Hamburg: Fachbereich Psychologie
ubs.fakultaetPsychologie: Hochschulen Deutschland
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:PsyDok

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
HAFOS_39.pdf91,02 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.