Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/757
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorMontada, Leo
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-12
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T10:31:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-12
dc.date.available2015-12-01T10:31:05Z-
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.otherurn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-37977-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/757-
dc.description.abstractIt is a widespread opinion among philosophers and psychologists that altruistic acts are motivated by charitable love or sympathy toward the needy (Bloom, 1981; Hoffman, 1981; Staub, 1978). Of course, altruism might be deined by just this kind of motivation. However, we also know of helpful concern for others in fulillment of obligations set by social or personal norms. Staub (1978) has distinguished between two types of prosocial goals: prosocial orientation and orientation toward duty and obligation. Rushton (1981) has distinguished between empathic and normative altruism. The present study focuses on one category of normative altruism: prosocial commitments motivated by perceived injustice and aimed at removing injustice. The thesis of this chapter is that when we perceive people who suffer misery and needs that seem undeserved we will be motivated to restitute justice. Prosocial activities in their favor are one way to attempt this. Of course, there are alternative ways to reestablish justice. One alternative may be to reinterpret the misery of the needy as deserved or as self-inflicted: These appraisals, subjectively, cancel injustice. Another way could be to blame and to punish those who are responsible for the miseryen
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightspubl-ohne-podde
dc.rights.urihttp://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.phpde
dc.subject.classificationAffektive Bindungde
dc.subject.classificationProsoziales Verhaltende
dc.subject.classificationSchuldgefühlde
dc.subject.classificationKognitionde
dc.subject.classificationAttributionde
dc.subject.classificationGerechtigkeitde
dc.subject.classificationVerantwortlichkeitde
ubs.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.otherVerbundenheitsgefühlde
dc.subject.otherBenachteiligtede
dc.subject.otherProsoziales Verhaltende
dc.subject.otherSchuldgefühlde
dc.subject.otherKognitionende
dc.subject.otherAttributionde
dc.subject.otherGerechtigkeitde
dc.subject.otherVerantwortlichkeitde
dc.subject.otherCommitmenten
dc.subject.otherDisadvantageden
dc.subject.otherProsocial Behavioren
dc.subject.otherGuilten
dc.subject.otherCognitionsen
dc.subject.otherJusticeen
dc.subject.otherResponsibilityen
dc.subject.otherEmotional Responsesen
dc.subject.otherLongitudinal Studiesen
dc.titleJustice and Prosocial Commitmentsen
dc.typeAufsatz
ubs.publikation.typarticle
ubs.publikation.sourceIn: Leo Montada Hans Werner Bierhoff (Editors) Altruism in Social Systems. Stuttgart 1991.
ubs.institutUniversität des Saarlandes: Fachrichtung Psychologie
ubs.fakultaetPsychologie: Hochschulen Deutschland
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:PsyDok

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Justice.pdf3,48 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.