Book Part

Social emotions in discussion Groups

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Brandstätter, Hermann

Abstract / Description

Previous research on attitude change through persuasive argumentation has focused on a large number of characteristics of the source, the message, and the receiver (see McGuire, 1969), most of which were either not immediately related to the emotional aspects of the influence process, or were not analyzed in the context of discussion. During the last decade the choice shift phenomenon has almost completely absorbed the research activities in the area of group discussion (see Cartwright, 1971; Pruitt, 1971; Sauer, 1974; Meyers, and Lamm, 1976), with little attention paid to social-emotional factors. A variety of explanations for the rather regularly observed movement of mean group preference away from the indifference point toward one or the other pole of bipolar scales have been proposed, one of which has turned out especially promising. The proportion of pro and con arguments arising in the discussion (Burnstein, 1969; Burnstein et al., 1973; Ebbesen and Bowers, 1974; Bishop and Myers, 1974) seems to determine the choice shift, thus pointing to the importance of informational influence (Deutsch and Gerard, 1955).

Keyword(s)

Persuasiver Sprechakt Gruppendiskussion Soziales System Gefühl Persuasiver Sprechakt Gruppendiskussion Soziales System Gefühl Persuasive Communication Group Discussion Social Emotion

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

1978

Is part of

In: Dynamics of group decisions. Edited by Hermann Brandstcitter. London 1978.

Citation

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Brandstätter, Hermann
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2022-11-21T13:55:15Z
  • Made available on
    2014-06-30
  • Made available on
    2015-12-01T10:31:11Z
  • Made available on
    2022-11-21T13:55:15Z
  • Date of first publication
    1978
  • Abstract / Description
    Previous research on attitude change through persuasive argumentation has focused on a large number of characteristics of the source, the message, and the receiver (see McGuire, 1969), most of which were either not immediately related to the emotional aspects of the influence process, or were not analyzed in the context of discussion. During the last decade the choice shift phenomenon has almost completely absorbed the research activities in the area of group discussion (see Cartwright, 1971; Pruitt, 1971; Sauer, 1974; Meyers, and Lamm, 1976), with little attention paid to social-emotional factors. A variety of explanations for the rather regularly observed movement of mean group preference away from the indifference point toward one or the other pole of bipolar scales have been proposed, one of which has turned out especially promising. The proportion of pro and con arguments arising in the discussion (Burnstein, 1969; Burnstein et al., 1973; Ebbesen and Bowers, 1974; Bishop and Myers, 1974) seems to determine the choice shift, thus pointing to the importance of informational influence (Deutsch and Gerard, 1955).
    en
  • Publication status
    unknown
  • Review status
    unknown
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-40227
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/810
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.10104
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Is part of
    In: Dynamics of group decisions. Edited by Hermann Brandstcitter. London 1978.
  • Keyword(s)
    Persuasiver Sprechakt
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Gruppendiskussion
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Soziales System
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Gefühl
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Persuasiver Sprechakt
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Gruppendiskussion
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Soziales System
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Gefühl
    de
  • Keyword(s)
    Persuasive Communication
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Group Discussion
    en
  • Keyword(s)
    Social Emotion
    en
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Social emotions in discussion Groups
    en
  • DRO type
    bookPart
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsyDok