Social emotions in discussion Groups
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Brandstätter, Hermann
Abstract / Description
Previous research on attitude change through persuasive argumentation has
focused on a large number of characteristics of the source, the message,
and the receiver (see McGuire, 1969), most of which were either not
immediately related to the emotional aspects of the influence process, or
were not analyzed in the context of discussion. During the last decade the
choice shift phenomenon has almost completely absorbed the research activities in the area of group discussion (see Cartwright, 1971; Pruitt, 1971; Sauer, 1974; Meyers, and Lamm, 1976), with little attention paid to social-emotional factors. A variety of explanations for the rather regularly observed movement of mean group preference away from the indifference point toward one or the other pole of bipolar scales have been proposed, one of which has turned out especially promising. The proportion of pro and con arguments arising in the discussion (Burnstein, 1969; Burnstein et al., 1973; Ebbesen and Bowers, 1974; Bishop and Myers, 1974) seems to determine the choice shift, thus pointing to the importance of informational
influence (Deutsch and Gerard, 1955).
Keyword(s)
Persuasiver Sprechakt Gruppendiskussion Soziales System Gefühl Persuasiver Sprechakt Gruppendiskussion Soziales System Gefühl Persuasive Communication Group Discussion Social EmotionPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
1978
Is part of
In: Dynamics of group decisions. Edited by Hermann Brandstcitter. London 1978.
Citation
-
Social_Emotions1.pdfAdobe PDF - 2.26MBMD5: 741590182e54973ff2cf9513f303118a
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Brandstätter, Hermann
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2022-11-21T13:55:15Z
-
Made available on2014-06-30
-
Made available on2015-12-01T10:31:11Z
-
Made available on2022-11-21T13:55:15Z
-
Date of first publication1978
-
Abstract / DescriptionPrevious research on attitude change through persuasive argumentation has focused on a large number of characteristics of the source, the message, and the receiver (see McGuire, 1969), most of which were either not immediately related to the emotional aspects of the influence process, or were not analyzed in the context of discussion. During the last decade the choice shift phenomenon has almost completely absorbed the research activities in the area of group discussion (see Cartwright, 1971; Pruitt, 1971; Sauer, 1974; Meyers, and Lamm, 1976), with little attention paid to social-emotional factors. A variety of explanations for the rather regularly observed movement of mean group preference away from the indifference point toward one or the other pole of bipolar scales have been proposed, one of which has turned out especially promising. The proportion of pro and con arguments arising in the discussion (Burnstein, 1969; Burnstein et al., 1973; Ebbesen and Bowers, 1974; Bishop and Myers, 1974) seems to determine the choice shift, thus pointing to the importance of informational influence (Deutsch and Gerard, 1955).en
-
Publication statusunknown
-
Review statusunknown
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-psydok-40227
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/810
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.10104
-
Language of contenteng
-
Is part ofIn: Dynamics of group decisions. Edited by Hermann Brandstcitter. London 1978.
-
Keyword(s)Persuasiver Sprechaktde
-
Keyword(s)Gruppendiskussionde
-
Keyword(s)Soziales Systemde
-
Keyword(s)Gefühlde
-
Keyword(s)Persuasiver Sprechaktde
-
Keyword(s)Gruppendiskussionde
-
Keyword(s)Soziales Systemde
-
Keyword(s)Gefühlde
-
Keyword(s)Persuasive Communicationen
-
Keyword(s)Group Discussionen
-
Keyword(s)Social Emotionen
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleSocial emotions in discussion Groupsen
-
DRO typebookPart
-
Visible tag(s)PsyDok